<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical blog &#187; Risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/tag/risk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com</link>
	<description>Medical News and Health Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:24:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Even moderate drinking affects women&#039;s cancer risk</title>
		<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/21134.php4</link>
		<comments>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/21134.php4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Even]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moderate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antinode.org/21134.php4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drinking just a glass of wine a day increases women&#8217;s risk of breast cancer, as well as several other types of the disease, a new study concludes. The research, carried out among more than a million UK women, says that alcohol accounts for 5,000 cases of breast cancer every year.
 What do we know already?
 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drinking just a glass of wine a day increases women&#8217;s risk of breast cancer, as well as several other types of the disease, a new study concludes. The research, carried out among more than a million UK women, says that alcohol accounts for 5,000 cases of breast cancer every year.<br />
 What do we know already?<br />
 Many of us enjoy relaxing with a glass of wine at the end of the day. But it&#8217;s an unpalatable fact that alcohol can damage your health, especially<span id="more-21134"></span> when you look at alcohol&#8217;s links to some types of cancer. It&#8217;s easy to dismiss these stories as health scares, only relevant to heavy drinkers. But evidence is mounting that even moderate drinkers have an increased cancer risk.<br />
 Now researchers have examined the results from a very big study of women aged around 55, to see exactly how the amount of alcohol they drank related to their risk of getting different types of cancer. The women were recruited when they attended breast cancer screening and followed for the next 7 to 8 years, to see if they were diagnosed with any type of cancer.<br />
 What does the new study say?<br />
 Compared to women who said they drank only 1 or 2 units of alcohol a week, women who regularly drank the equivalent of 1 unit a day had an increased risk of getting seven types of cancer: breast, liver, rectum (part of the bowel), mouth, pharynx (a space at the back of the mouth), oesophagus (the tube that takes food from the mouth to the stomach) and larynx (voicebox).<br />
 The risk was most increased for breast cancer. In developed countries like the UK, the chance of having had breast cancer by the age of 75 is 9.5 in 100. According to the study, for every extra daily unit of alcohol (over 2 a week), that risk increases by 1.1 per 100. So if you had a roughly 9.5 percent chance of getting breast cancer by the age of 75, but you drank one glass of wine a day, that risk would go up to 10.6 percent. If you drank two glasses of wine a day, that would increase to 11.7 percent.<br />
 These might sound like quite small increases in risk. But because many women drink alcohol at these sorts of levels, it means a lot of women are affected overall. The researchers estimate that alcohol accounts for 11 percent of all breast cancers in the UK. That means that every year, 5,000 women get breast cancer who wouldn&#8217;t have got it without drinking alcohol.<br />
 The risk for cancers of the mouth, oesophagus, pharynx and larynx only increased for women who also smoked. Researchers think that alcohol may dissolve some of the toxins in cigarette smoke, making drinking and smoking together more risky than doing either alone. There was no increased risk of these cancers for women who drank alcohol but didn&#8217;t smoke.<br />
 The increased risks for rectum and liver cancer were relatively small, with an increased risk of 1 per 1000 and 0.7 per 1000 respectively.<br />
 Most of the women in the study were moderate drinkers. A quarter didn&#8217;t drink at all, and of those who drank, only 2 percent drank more than 21 units a week. The average woman in the study who drank alcohol had 7 units a week, or about one drink a day. That reflects previous studies of women in this age group (the average age was 55 at the start of the study).<br />
 How reliable are the findings?<br />
 The findings are likely to be fairly reliable. The study followed 1.28 million women, for an average 7 years. The women filled in questionnaires at the start of the study, and then again 3 years later, saying how much alcohol they drank. The researchers were also able to take account of other things that affect women&#8217;s cancer risk, such as whether they&#8217;d taken the contraceptive pill, HRT, whether they smoked or took exercise, and how much they weighed.<br />
 The researchers didn&#8217;t use the women who drank no alcohol at all as their comparison group. That&#8217;s because women who don&#8217;t drink at all may have quit alcohol because of serious health problems. So they&#8217;re not a healthy group to compare to. Instead, the researchers used women who drank only one or two alcoholic drinks a week as their comparison group. That&#8217;s likely to make the results more reliable.<br />
 Where does the study come from?<br />
 The study was done by the Cancer Epidemiology Unit at the University of Oxford. It was published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute and published by Oxford University Press. It was funded by Cancer Research UK, the UK Medical Research Council, and the NHS breast screening programme.<br />
 What does this mean for me?<br />
 Just about everything we do has risks. We can&#8217;t avoid risks altogether, but knowing about them can help us make decisions we are comfortable with. It&#8217;s been clear for some time that alcohol is a factor in women&#8217;s risk of getting cancer, especially breast cancer. This latest study puts some figures on that increased risk. You may find that this helps you decide whether you are happy with the amount of alcohol you drink.<br />
 What should I do now?<br />
 It helps to know how much you&#8217;re drinking. One unit is 10 millilitres (ml) or 8 grams of pure alcohol, which is the amount of pure alcohol in a 25 ml single measure of spirits (ABV 40%), a third of a pint of beer (ABV 5-6%) or half a standard (175 ml) glass of red wine (ABV 12%).<br />
 The government&#8217;s recommendations are not to drink more than 2 to 3 units a day for women or 3 to 4 units a day for men.<br />
 Allen NE, Beral V, Casabonne D, et al. Moderate alcohol intake and cancer incidence in women. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2009; 101: 296-305.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/21134.php4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>143</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genetic Test for Heart  Disease Risk in the Works</title>
		<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/18711.php4</link>
		<comments>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/18711.php4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antinode.org/18711.php4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SUNDAY, Feb. 8 (HealthDay News) &#8212; Perhaps five years from now, you might actually hear your doctor casually say, &#8220;While we&#8217;re at it, let&#8217;s do a blood test to see if your genetic makeup puts you at high risk of having a heart attack.&#8221;
 So says Dr. Sekar Kathiresan, an assistant professor of medicine at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUNDAY, Feb. 8 (HealthDay News) &#8212; Perhaps five years from now, you might actually hear your doctor casually say, &#8220;While we&#8217;re at it, let&#8217;s do a blood test to see if your genetic makeup puts you at high risk of having a heart attack.&#8221;<br />
 So says Dr. Sekar Kathiresan, an assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and director of preventive cardiology at Massachusetts General Hospital. He is the leader of a group that has identified three<span id="more-18711"></span> new genetic variants associated with an increased risk of heart attack.<br />
 That finding, which brings the total of such risk-associated variants to nine, is reported in the Feb. 8 online issue of<br />
 . The journal highlights a total of five papers from groups around the world looking at the genetics of heart disease.<br />
 The study led by Kathiresan, done by a group of six organizations called the Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium, is the largest of the five. It compared the genomes of about 3,000 people who had suffered heart attacks relatively early in life &#8212; under 50 in men, under 60 in women &#8212; with those of 3,000 people who hadn&#8217;t had a heart attack.<br />
 It&#8217;s known that heart disease tends to cluster in families, Kathiresan said, in part because family members tend to share bad habits, such as smoking. The aim of the study was to single out the role of genes in increased familial risk.<br />
 &#8220;We looked at about 1 million different spots in the genomes, the frequency of the letters in the genomes in cases and controls,&#8221; Kathiresan said. &#8220;The genome-wide study identified nine spots associated with an increased risk of heart attack, six of which had been previously described. We showed that when you combined the information from the nine different spots, the 20 percent of the people who had the most unfavorable profile had a 2.25-fold greater risk of having a heart attack, compared to the 20 percent with the best genetic profile.&#8221;<br />
 Work needs to be done before this information can be put to medical use, he said. &#8220;We must test this panel in other studies,&#8221; he said. &#8220;If the results hold up, it will be worth doing tests in clinical situations.&#8221;<br />
 Such a genetic test would not be a big deal compared to tests now done routinely, Kathiresan noted. &#8220;It would be no more expensive than the standard tests that are done to measure blood cholesterol levels,&#8221; he said.<br />
 Such a test &#8220;could be useful in guiding treatments, such as who should get statins at an early age to lessen LDL cholesterol levels,&#8221; Kathiresan said. Meanwhile, research is being done to learn how these genetic variants increase heart attack risk.<br />
 &#8220;Of the nine, three seem to be acting through LDL cholesterol,&#8221; Kathiresan said. &#8220;One gene region seems to directly increase the risk of build-up of atherosclerotic plaque in heart arteries.&#8221;<br />
 The four other studies in the journal indicated that a heart attack risk test would not be limited to those nine genes. A report from France described an association with clusters of variants of three genes on chromosome 6. A Japanese study found an association with a gene, designated BRAP, that may be involved in inflammation. Researchers in Iceland identified five genetic variations governing the blood cells called eosinophils, which also play a role in inflammation. A German study described a gene that is highly expressed in the cardiovascular system and might be involved in the adhesion of cells to one another.<br />
 &#8220;We know that this is not the end,&#8221; said Jeanette Erdmann, a professor of genetics at the University of Lubeck, and lead author of the German report. &#8220;It is hard to predict how many loci you might find.&#8221;<br />
 Such tests probably wouldn&#8217;t be used in childhood, Erdmann said. &#8220;But I can imagine a 30-year-old man with a family history of heart disease having one,&#8221; she said. &#8220;It would be good for him to get a test of these genetic variants and find out if it is important to modify the other factors that lead to heart disease, such as obesity and high blood pressure.&#8221;<br />
 A next step for the German group, which collaborates with the French researchers, is to do &#8220;some kind of meta-analysis of the genome,&#8221; Erdmann said. &#8220;It will be an analysis of 15,000 cases and 15,000 controls,&#8221; she said. &#8220;We have started doing it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/18711.php4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family History of Melanoma Doubles Parkinson&#039;s Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/19808.php4</link>
		<comments>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/19808.php4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doubles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antinode.org/19808.php4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MONDAY, Feb. 16 (HealthDay News) &#8212; People with a family history of melanoma are twice as likely to develop Parkinson&#8217;s disease, a new study finds.
 While the reasons for this association are not clear, other studies have shown that people with Parkinson&#8217;s diseases are at greater risk for developing melanoma.
 &#8220;For people with a family [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MONDAY, Feb. 16 (HealthDay News) &#8212; People with a family history of melanoma are twice as likely to develop Parkinson&#8217;s disease, a new study finds.<br />
 While the reasons for this association are not clear, other studies have shown that people with Parkinson&#8217;s diseases are at greater risk for developing melanoma.<br />
 &#8220;For people with a family member with melanoma, they may be at risk for Parkinson&#8217;s disease,&#8221; said lead researcher Dr. Xiang Gao, an instructor<span id="more-19808"></span> in medicine at Harvard University School of Public Health. &#8220;This study suggests that some genetic components for melanoma are associated with Parkinson&#8217;s disease.&#8221;<br />
 Earlier studies had found that Parkinson&#8217;s patients taking levodopa, a common treatment for the condition, were more susceptible to melanoma, Gao said. &#8220;They thought that levodopa increased the risk of melanoma,&#8221; he explained.<br />
 But later reports found that people with melanoma were at high risk of developing Parkinson&#8217;s disease, Gao said. &#8220;This suggests that it may not be the drugs, it could be something else, which is why I did this study,&#8221; he said.<br />
 The finding was released Monday and was also expected be presented at the American Academy of Neurology&#8217;s annual meeting, April 25 to May 2, in Seattle.<br />
 For the study, Gao&#8217;s team collected data on almost 157,000 men and women who did not have Parkinson&#8217;s disease. These individuals participated in the Health Professional Follow-up Study and the Nurses Health Study.<br />
 During 14 years of follow-up, 616 people developed Parkinson&#8217;s disease. Among those people who also reported a family history of melanoma, the risk for developing Parkinson&#8217;s disease was doubled, the researchers found.<br />
 After adjusting for other factors such as colorectal, lung, prostate or breast cancer as well as age, smoking or caffeine consumption, only the association between melanoma and Parkinson&#8217;s disease was significant, the researchers reported.<br />
 Dr. Roberto Zanetti,  director of the Piedmont Cancer Registry in Torino, Italy, and an expert in the connection between Parkinson&#8217;s and melanoma, doesn&#8217;t think this study adds much to what has already been  reported.<br />
 &#8220;It seems to add a piece of evidence to the question of the association between Parkinson&#8217;s disease and melanoma,&#8221; Zanetti said. &#8220;The abstract does not add much about the mechanisms. And, in terms of interpretation, it does not seems to add much to what we have discussed in<br />
 two years ago,&#8221; he said.<br />
 For more about Parkinson&#8217;s disease, visit the<br />
 .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/19808.php4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could diet be key link to dementia risk?</title>
		<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/20747.php4</link>
		<comments>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/20747.php4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Could]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dementia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antinode.org/20747.php4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Could an unhealthy diet increase the risk of developing dementia later in life?
 That is the question that led neurodegeneration researcher Jeffery Keller from the Sanders-Brown Institute on Aging in Lexington, Ky., to the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in July to study dementia.
 &#8220;We saw our work in dementia moving toward understanding how nutrition, obesity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6PVe6Bt9iag&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6PVe6Bt9iag&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>Could an unhealthy diet increase the risk of developing dementia later in life?<br />
 That is the question that led neurodegeneration researcher Jeffery Keller from the Sanders-Brown Institute on Aging in Lexington, Ky., to the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in July to study dementia.<br />
 &ldquo;We saw our work in dementia moving toward understanding how nutrition, obesity and diabetes are emerging as risk factors in dementia and the elderly,&rdquo;<span id="more-20747"></span> Keller said.<br />
 In order to explore that link, Keller said that he and his wife, Annadora Bruce-Keller, a neurobiologist who also studies dementia, came to Pennington where there are the tools and experienced research staff to examine that link. Now, Keller is tasked with starting a new research effort at Pennington, the Institute for Dementia Research and Prevention.<br />
 Citing his wife&rsquo;s research on dementia in people who have contracted the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), dementia can be brought on by inflammation in the body, he said.<br />
 &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a lot of evidence dementia is not necessarily a disease of the brain,&rdquo; Keller said.<br />
 Inflammation plays a role in other diseases, such as diabetes. Conditions such as obesity or a poor diet with little exercise can increase inflammation as well.<br />
 For example, Keller published a paper in November&rsquo;s Journal of Neurochemistry that linked the typical high-fat diet of most Americans to the acceleration of brain degeneration in mice bred to have Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease.<br />
 &ldquo;The biggest risk factor is age,&rdquo; Keller said. &ldquo;We still don&rsquo;t know why that is. Clearly it has something to do with how these different parts of the body change and affect the brain.&rdquo;<br />
 Pennington researchers have been looking at aging and its related conditions for years.<br />
 Don Ingram, who researches aging and is among the researchers who will participate in the institute, is looking for a medication or nutritional supplement that could slow the rate of aging and diseases, such as dementia, that develop during the aging process.<br />
 This idea comes from studies on caloric restriction of mice and other animals, which Ingram did during his 26-year tenure at the National Institute on Aging.<br />
 Animal studies, ranging from dogs to monkeys, have shown that by reducing how much food is eaten by 30 percent, the equivalent of a human going from a 2,500-calorie diet to a 1,750-calorie diet, not only slowed aging but delayed the onset of heart disease, cancer and dementia, he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/20747.php4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drink a day increases cancer risk</title>
		<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/20996.php4</link>
		<comments>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/20996.php4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antinode.org/20996.php4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A glass of wine each evening is enough to increase your risk of developing cancer, women are being warned.
 Consuming just one drink a day causes an extra 7,000 cancer cases &#8211; mostly breast cancer &#8211; in UK women each year, Cancer Research UK scientists say.
 The risk goes up the more you drink, whether [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A glass of wine each evening is enough to increase your risk of developing cancer, women are being warned.<br />
 Consuming just one drink a day causes an extra 7,000 cancer cases &#8211; mostly breast cancer &#8211; in UK women each year, Cancer Research UK scientists say.<br />
 The risk goes up the more you drink, whether spirits, wine or beer, the data on over a million women suggests.<br />
 Overall, alcohol is to blame for about 13% of breast, liver, rectum, mouth and<span id="more-20996"></span> throat cancers, the researchers say.<br />
  They estimate that about 5,000 cases of breast cancer in the UK &#8211; 11% of the 45,000 cases diagnosed each year &#8211; can be attributed to women&#8217;s consumption of alcohol.<br />
 The study looked specifically at women who consumed low to moderate levels of alcohol &#8211; defined as three drinks a day or fewer.<br />
 Over the seven years of the study, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, a quarter of the 1.3 million women reported drinking no alcohol.<br />
   Of those who did drink, virtually all consumed fewer than 21 drinks per week, and an average of 10g of alcohol per day, which is equivalent to just over one unit of alcohol found in half a pint of lager, a 125ml glass of wine or a single measure of spirits.<br />
 Nearly 70,000 of the middle-aged women developed cancer and a pattern emerged with alcohol consumption.<br />
 One too many?<br />
 Consuming one drink a day increased the risk of all types of cancer by 6% in women up to the age of 75.<br />
 The rates for individual cancers varied, with one drink a day causing a 12% rise in the risk of breast cancer, a 10% rise in rectal cancer, a 22% rise in gullet cancer, a 29% rise in mouth cancer and a 44% rise in throat cancer.<br />
   On a population scale, this would mean 15 extra cases of these cancers diagnosed for every 1,000 women &#8211; comprising 11 breast, one mouth, one rectal cancer and 0.7 each for cancers of the gullet, throat and liver.<br />
 The government says no amount of alcohol is fully safe, but recommends women should drink no more than two to three units per day on a regular basis to have a lower risk of any harm to health.<br />
 For men the recommended limit is no more than three to four units per day.<br />
 Lead author Dr Naomi Allen from the University of Oxford said her work would help the government assess whether the limits should be changed, although the study did not look at men.<br />
 &#8220;The findings of this report show quite strongly that even low levels of drinking that were regarded to be safe do increase cancer risk.<br />
 &#8220;About 5% of all cancers in the UK are due to drinking something in the order of one alcoholic drink a day.&#8221;<br />
 She said there was confusion about how much people should drink. Research has shown a daily tipple can be good for the heart. And factors other than alcohol pose a bigger risk for certain cancers.<br />
 &#8220;It is up to individual people to make their own decision. All of us to some extent have to weigh up the risks and take some responsibility for our health,&#8221; said Dr Allen.<br />
   A Department of Health spokesman said: &#8220;We keep our guidance on sensible drinking under review. We currently advise on a lower risk drinking limit and that drinking above this level could be harmful.<br />
 &#8220;There is no completely safe level of drinking but this lower level reflects the known risks including breast cancer, which is partly why there is a lower drinking limit for women.<br />
 &#8220;We look forward to examining this research in more detail.&#8221;<br />
 Dr Sarah Cant of Breakthrough Breast Cancer said: &#8220;We already know that drinking alcohol can increase your risk of breast cancer.<br />
 &#8220;This study suggests that for women over 50 even drinking moderate amounts of any type of alcohol can have many health consequences, including a greater chance of developing breast cancer.<br />
 &#8220;Around 80% of breast cancer cases are diagnosed in women aged over 50, so limiting how much you drink is one step you can take to try to reduce your risk of developing the disease.&#8221;<br />
 Breast cancer is now the most common cancer in the UK. Each year almost 45,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer. A woman&#8217;s lifetime risk for breast cancer in the UK is one in nine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/20996.php4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diet, Exercise Cuts Kids&#039; Risk for Metabolic Syndrome</title>
		<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/14974.php4</link>
		<comments>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/14974.php4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndrome]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antinode.org/14974.php4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Metabolic syndrome in adults occurs when they have at least three risk factors from among abdominal obesity (waist circumference more than 35 inches for women; 40 inches for men); low HDL (&#8220;good&#8221;) cholesterol; high triglycerides; high fasting glucose; and high blood pressure.
 Although sometimes difficult to diagnosis in children, similar clustering can appear in childhood. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/12f1as8wIHw&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/12f1as8wIHw&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>Metabolic syndrome in adults occurs when they have at least three risk factors from among abdominal obesity (waist circumference more than 35 inches for women; 40 inches for men); low HDL (&#8220;good&#8221;) cholesterol; high triglycerides; high fasting glucose; and high blood pressure.<br />
 Although sometimes difficult to diagnosis in children, similar clustering can appear in childhood. The report, published online Jan. 12 in<br />
 , called for clinicians to measure<span id="more-14974"></span> and to treat the individual pieces of the syndrome in children while intervening to break bad diet and exercise habits.<br />
 &#8220;The adverse risk factors and the connections between them that eventually lead to the metabolic syndrome begin in childhood,&#8221; Dr. Julia Steinberger, director of Pediatric Echocardiography and Preventive Cardiology at the University of Minnesota Children&#8217;s Hospital in Minneapolis, said in an American Heart Association news release. She chaired the group that wrote the report.<br />
 Much of the increased risk is tied to the continued increase in childhood obesity, which the heart association said is around 17 percent of all children aged 6 to 19. Having a body-mass index at or above the 95th percentile for the child&#8217;s age is considered being obese.<br />
 &#8220;We can say that childhood obesity is our biggest problem,&#8221; Steinberger said. &#8220;It&#8217;s been shown that when diet and exercise are improved in overweight children, the structure and function of blood vessels improves even in the absence of weight loss.&#8221;<br />
 .<br />
 SOURCE: American Heart Association, news release, Jan. 12, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/14974.php4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heart risk cited in newer antipsychotic drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/15517.php4</link>
		<comments>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/15517.php4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antipsychotic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antinode.org/15517.php4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The number of prescriptions for the drugs written for children and adolescents doubled to 4.4 million from 2003 to 2006, in part because of increases in diagnoses of bipolar disorder. Their efficacy in children and Alzheimer&#8217;s patients has never been demonstrated, experts said.
 Eli Lilly &#038; Co., the manufacturer of Zyprexa, is expected to settle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gBLeVcP_JQg&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gBLeVcP_JQg&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>The number of prescriptions for the drugs written for children and adolescents doubled to 4.4 million from 2003 to 2006, in part because of increases in diagnoses of bipolar disorder. Their efficacy in children and Alzheimer&#8217;s patients has never been demonstrated, experts said.<br />
 Eli Lilly &#038; Co., the manufacturer of Zyprexa, is expected to settle a lawsuit with the federal government as early as today, paying a record $1.4 billion in civil and criminal<span id="more-15517"></span> charges to resolve complaints about the marketing of Zyprexa for unapproved uses. The company has already paid nearly $1.3 billion to states and consumers to settle other complaints about marketing and side effects.<br />
 &#8220;I am, and have been, very concerned about these drugs,&#8221; said Dr. Ian Cook, a psychiatrist at UCLA&#8217;s Geffen School of Medicine who was not involved in the new study. &#8220;These are powerful medications that affect the brain and the body, and we need to be very thoughtful in their use.&#8221;<br />
 No one, however, is urging abandonment of the atypical antipsychotics. The nub of the matter is that there are no other drugs with the same beneficial effects.<br />
 &#8220;The antipsychotics are a godsend,&#8221; said Dr. Alan Manevitz, a psychiatrist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York who was not involved in the study. &#8220;They have taken people and unchained them from walls. . . . We don&#8217;t want to throw out the baby with the bathwater.&#8221;<br />
 The drugs are approved only for treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in the general population. But their use has been expanding to treat aggression in young people and dementia in the elderly.<br />
 &#8220;We use them because they are somewhat useful in some patients . . . and because we have no alternative,&#8221; said Dr. Dilip V. Jeste of UC San Diego.<br />
 Researchers already knew that atypical antipsychotics could produce excessive weight gain, increase the risk of diabetes and induce strokes and heart problems in the elderly. The Food and Drug Administration requires both conventional and atypical antipsychotics to carry a so-called black-box warning &#8212; the strongest warning possible &#8212; informing patients and physicians that the drugs are associated with increased risk of death in elderly patients treated for dementia.<br />
 In their federally funded study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the researchers analyzed Tennessee Medicaid records for the 15 years ending in 2005. They identified 44,000 users of conventional antipsychotics and 46,000 of atypical antipsychotics. They compared them with 186,600 matched patients taking neither.<br />
 The scientists found that patients taking either type of drug were about twice as likely to die of a heart attack as those not taking the drugs, with the risk of death increasing with dose and the length of time on the medication. There were about 3.3 excess deaths per year for every 1,000 patients taking the drugs.<br />
 The prescribing of drugs &#8220;is a balancing of risks and benefits. Our study gives more information on the risk side of things,&#8221; said study leader Dr. Wayne A. Ray of the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.<br />
 Conventional antipsychotics, such as haloperidol (Haldol) and chlorpromazine (Thorazine), were stumbled on by chance in the 1950s and were found to have a powerful calming effect on psychotic patients, but also a number of side effects. Among the most disturbing was tardive dyskinesia, characterized by tremors and other movement disorders that are often irreversible.<br />
 The atypical antipsychotics, which also include Clozaril, Geodon and Abilify, were designed to avoid tardive dyskinesia, which is why they were perceived as safer, Ray said. &#8220;Today, nearly all people taking antipsychotics are taking the atypical ones,&#8221; he said.<br />
 In an editorial accompanying the paper, Dr. Sebastian Schneeweiss and Dr. Jerry Avorn of Brigham and Women&#8217;s Hospital in Boston argue that the danger can be mitigated by assessing patients&#8217; cardiovascular risk before treatment and after a month on the drugs. Patients with a heightened risk could be counseled on ways to lower it, such as modifications of diet and exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/15517.php4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bird Flu Risk Rises Ahead of Lunar New Year Next Week</title>
		<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/16210.php4</link>
		<comments>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/16210.php4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lunar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antinode.org/16210.php4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jan. 21 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Human bird-flu infections may rise in
Asia as people handle more poultry for next week’s Lunar New Year
celebrations, according to a United Nations veterinarian who
tracks the virus in birds.
 Health authorities in China, South Korea and Vietnam have
stepped up surveillance of H5N1 avian influenza among poultry
ahead of the festival, which starts Jan. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan. 21 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Human bird-flu infections may rise in<br />
Asia as people handle more poultry for next week’s Lunar New Year<br />
celebrations, according to a United Nations veterinarian who<br />
tracks the virus in birds.<br />
 Health authorities in China, South Korea and Vietnam have<br />
stepped up surveillance of H5N1 avian influenza among poultry<br />
ahead of the festival, which starts Jan. 26. Production of<br />
chickens and ducks swells as much as three times in the<span id="more-16210"></span> run-up to<br />
the holiday, making outbreaks more likely, said<br />
 in Hanoi, Vietnam.<br />
 “It’s a little bit more of a tinderbox,” Gilbert said in a<br />
telephone interview yesterday. “If it’s going to happen, it’s<br />
more likely to happen now than in another two or three months.”<br />
 A flu pandemic of avian or other origin could kill 71<br />
million people worldwide and lead to a “major global recession”<br />
costing more than $3 trillion, according to a worst-case scenario<br />
outlined by the World Bank in October.<br />
 Indonesia, which leads the world in human deaths from bird<br />
flu, reported two more fatalities today. China has reported three<br />
human deaths from the virus this year and Vietnam has reported<br />
one case in a girl who recovered. Last week Nepal reported its<br />
first outbreak of the virus among poultry.<br />
 In Vietnam, the nation with the most outbreaks of H5N1 in<br />
birds since late 2003, cases in poultry surged in the lead-up to<br />
the Lunar New Year every year from 2004 to 2007, FAO figures show.<br />
The number of outbreaks in the country have dropped roughly by<br />
half in the past two years, and no new infections in fowl have<br />
been reported so far this year to the Paris-based<br />
 .<br />
 Health authorities have been monitoring H5N1 for more than a<br />
decade for any sign that it’s becoming as contagious as seasonal<br />
flu. While millions of birds have been infected, fewer than 400<br />
people are reported to have contracted the illness, of which<br />
almost 250 have died, according to the Geneva-based<br />
 .<br />
 The world is closer to another flu pandemic than at any time<br />
since 1968, when the last of the previous century’s three<br />
pandemics occurred, according to the WHO. The H5N1 virus has<br />
spread to more than 60 countries and caused at least 6,500<br />
poultry outbreaks since 2003.<br />
 .<br />
 Last Updated: January 21, 2009  02:59 EST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/16210.php4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multivitamin Use and Risk  of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease in &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/18902.php4</link>
		<comments>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/18902.php4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiovascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multivitamin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antinode.org/18902.php4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marian L. Neuhouser, PhD
 Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, PhD
 Cynthia Thomson, PhD, RD
 Aaron Aragaki, MS
 Garnet L. Anderson, PhD
 JoAnn E. Manson, MD, DrPH
 Ruth E. Patterson, PhD
 Thomas E. Rohan, MD, PhD
 Linda van Horn, MD, PhD
 James M. Shikany, DrPH
 Asha Thomas, PhD
 Andrea LaCroix, PhD
 Ross L. Prentice, PhD
 Arch Intern Med.
  2009;169(3):294-304.
 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marian L. Neuhouser, PhD<br />
 Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, PhD<br />
 Cynthia Thomson, PhD, RD<br />
 Aaron Aragaki, MS<br />
 Garnet L. Anderson, PhD<br />
 JoAnn E. Manson, MD, DrPH<br />
 Ruth E. Patterson, PhD<br />
 Thomas E. Rohan, MD, PhD<br />
 Linda van Horn, MD, PhD<br />
 James M. Shikany, DrPH<br />
 Asha Thomas, PhD<br />
 Andrea LaCroix, PhD<br />
 Ross L. Prentice, PhD<br />
 Arch Intern Med.<br />
  2009;169(3):294-304.<br />
   Millions of postmenopausal women use multivitamins,<br />
 as cancer and cardiovascular<span id="more-18902"></span> disease (CVD). Therefore, we decided<br />
 cancer, CVD, and mortality in postmenopausal women.<br />
 in 3 overlapping trials of hormone therapy, dietary modification,<br />
 (N = 93 676). Detailed data were collected on<br />
 multivitamin use at baseline and follow-up time points. Study<br />
 up for a median of 8.0 years in the clinical trials and 7.9<br />
 years in the observational study. Disease end points were collected<br />
 through 2005.<br />
 We documented cancers of the breast (invasive), colon/rectum,<br />
 endometrium, kidney, bladder, stomach, ovary, and lung; CVD<br />
 (myocardial infarction, stroke, and venous thromboembolism);<br />
 and total mortality.<br />
 A total of 41.5% of the participants used multivitamins.<br />
 After a median of 8.0 years of follow-up in the clinical trial<br />
 cohort and 7.9 years in the observational study cohort, 9619<br />
 cases of breast, colorectal, endometrial, renal, bladder, stomach,<br />
 lung, or ovarian cancer; 8751 CVD events; and 9865 deaths were<br />
 reported. Multivariate-adjusted analyses revealed no association<br />
 of multivitamin use with risk of cancer (hazard ratio [HR],<br />
 0.98, and 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.05 for breast<br />
 cancer; HR, 0.99, and 95% CI, 0.88-1.11 for colorectal cancer;<br />
 HR, 1.05, and 95% CI, 0.90-1.21 for endometrial cancer; HR,<br />
 1.0, and 95% CI, 0.88-1.13 for lung cancer; and HR, 1.07, and<br />
 95% CI, 0.88-1.29 for ovarian cancer); CVD (HR, 0.96, and 95%<br />
 CI, 0.89-1.03 for myocardial infarction; HR, 0.99, and 95% CI,<br />
 0.91-1.07 for stroke; and HR, 1.05, and 95% CI, 0.85-1.29 for<br />
 venous thromboembolism); or mortality (HR, 1.02, and 95% CI,<br />
 0.97-1.07).<br />
 After a median follow-up of 8.0 and 7.9 years<br />
 in the clinical trial and observational study cohorts, respectively,<br />
 of common cancers, CVD, or total mortality in postmenopausal<br />
 women.<br />
 clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:<br />
 Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (Drs Neuhouser, Anderson, Patterson, LaCroix, and Prentice and Mr Aragaki); Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York (Drs Wassertheil-Smoller and Rohan); Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson (Dr Thomson); Division of Preventive Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Manson); Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, California (Dr Patterson); Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (Dr van Horn); Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Dr Shikany); and Medstar Research Institute, Washington, DC (Dr Thomas).<br />
 Arch Intern Med.<br />
 2009;169(3):216.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/18902.php4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diana Jones: HPV exposure increases cervical cancer risk</title>
		<link>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/14684.php4</link>
		<comments>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/14684.php4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cervical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antinode.org/14684.php4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q. What is HPV?
 A. HPV stands for Human Papillomavirus. The term papillomavirus indicates that a given virus causes warts (papillomas) that might appear on hands, feet or on the genital area; however, not all HPV viruses cause warts.
 Q. What are genital warts?
 A. Genital warts are flesh-colored growths that are usually caused by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q. What is HPV?<br />
 A. HPV stands for Human Papillomavirus. The term papillomavirus indicates that a given virus causes warts (papillomas) that might appear on hands, feet or on the genital area; however, not all HPV viruses cause warts.<br />
 Q. What are genital warts?<br />
 A. Genital warts are flesh-colored growths that are usually caused by certain types of HPV, and usually appear on the outside of the genitals or near the anus of females and males. Sometimes,<span id="more-14684"></span> but rarely, they might even appear inside the vagina and on the cervix.<br />
 Q. Who gets genital warts?<br />
 A. Anyone who has any kind of sexual activity involving the genitals could get genital HPV, and certain types of HPV can develop into genital warts. After sexual contact with an infected person, genital warts can appear within weeks, months, years, or not at all. They are common, and more than 260,000 new cases of genital warts have been estimated in the United States. Genital warts often don&#8217;t cause any symptoms, but occasionally might cause some burning, itching, or pain.  If you suspect you might have external genital warts, see your health-care professional, as he/she can usually recognize them just by seeing them.<br />
 Treatment varies, and they can be removed by use of a prescription cream, or by freezing, burning or laser.  If none of these methods work, they might have to be removed surgically.<br />
 Q. How is HPV spread?<br />
 A. Of more than 200 different types of HPV, 40 of those strains are spread through sexual contact. Some types are high risk and can cause cervical cancer or abnormal cells in the lining of the cervix that sometimes turn into cancer. Others are low risk and can cause genital warts and changes in the cervix that are benign or noncancerous. Statistics tell us that most adults who have been sexually active have been exposed to HPV. It is estimated that up to 75 percent of the reproductive-age population has been infected with one or more types of genital HPV with about 5.5 million new cases each year.<br />
 Q. How can HPV be prevented?<br />
 A. The only way to eliminate the risk of contracting HPV is to refrain from all genital contact with another individual. For those who are sexually active, condom use might help prevent the spread of HPV although HPV can affect both areas covered by a condom and areas uncovered. Although condom use has been associated with a lower rate of cervical cancer, the degree of protection provided by condoms in HPV transmission is unknown. In 2006, the FDA approved Gardasil, a vaccine that is highly effective in preventing infection with HPV types 16 and 18.<br />
 Gardasil is a vaccine that helps protect against diseases caused by HPV, but it will not treat them. Receiving Gardasil also doesn&#8217;t mean you no longer need routine cervical screening Pap tests, and it might not fully protect everyone who receives it.<br />
 The Cancer Center at BMH will be offering a free cervical cancer screening on Jan. 29 for women between 18-70 who have not had a Pap test in the past 12 months, or are uninsured or underinsured. To schedule an appointment, call (765) 741-1073 or (800) 237-9625.<br />
 Diana Jones, RNC, MSN, WHNP, is an OB/GYN and women&#8217;s health nurse practitioner at the BSU Women&#8217;s Center, managed by Ball Memorial Hospital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.raganvirtualworkshops.com/14684.php4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

